Thursday, June 23

For those of you with children (or not), here’s a question. Which is easier to raise? A boy or a girl? Which of the two is more preferable? While I realize that all children lack any sign of detectable brain activity until well after puberty, I firmly believe there is a major difference.

For me personally, I feel girls are much easier. Ok, yes, they are moody. All right, all right, I fully comprehend that with them, everything is a major life-altering event. Yes, I understand that if you look cross-eyed at them, they will burst in to a hysterical plethora of uncontrollable weeping. I can now report that with my eldest child, the friend of the week has now whittled down to “friend of the hour.” Meow.

I’m the mother of two children, both female. Even though they have a tendency to remind me of Kathy Bates, in Misery (I’m your number one fan), I love them to death. Both have friends of the male persuasion. Chickie has one of them attached to her hip. But? They are just friends, because you know, “ewww, GOD MOM GET A CLUE. I don't LIKE him, like him.” I have so much to learn.

But I’m floundering. The boys? I cannot relate. They are all polite to me, but they seem to just bounce around. They teach my willing children delicate roses to belch, fart and scratch, loud enough and often enough to make a redneck proud. If you are reading this, and are married to me, you are not excluded. They give me presents, which include toads and spiders, and gleefully bring me their bounty of cockroaches, each vying for the spot of "which one of us has the bigger insect." They look at me expectantly when they hand me a shoebox, carefully filled with dirt and plants, and A.LITTLE.TINY.SNAKE. They lean up against me when I am cooking, hoping that I will let them taste “whatever is on the stove that smells so good because I haven not eaten in like, forever, because my parents don’t have any food, and can I spend the night?”

So, now that I've given you all the positive sides of both sexes, which one would you chose?

Posted by Moogie at June 23, 2005 06:07 PM

Comments

I only have two boys so I am not really qualified to answer. However, I have a niece who constantly smarts off and squeals until my ears bleed. My vote is going to the boys.

Posted by: Heather at June 23, 2005 06:59 PM

Neither. Not for another five years or so. ;)

Posted by: Dana at June 24, 2005 01:08 AM

I think a lot of it has to do w/ the combination and timing of the children. My brother and I were hell on my parents when we were younger. We were only 3 years apart and fought constantly. My sister, who is 11 years younger, was pretty much the perfect child.

Posted by: MrZoot at June 24, 2005 09:43 AM

If you had asked me anytime in the previous 11.8 years, I would have answered, quite confidently, "BOYS!" My daughter was always an emotional handful, but my gentle, sweet, loving baby boy has been nothing but joy for 11.8 years.
Now he is a ball of raging testosterone and I have no idea who he is from this day to the next. Lord help me.

Posted by: Robin at June 24, 2005 09:59 AM

I must preface this with I love my daughters all 6 of them, however, if boys are more difficult I am definately not up to the task and God knew what he was doing when he handed me daughters. Whining, crying, weeping for no apparent reason, backstabbing, emotional breakdowns, mood swings. . .HELP ME ;)

Posted by: Melonie at June 24, 2005 10:34 AM

I can answer this one - easy peasy because I'm stuck with fortunate enough to have one of each.
Girls and Boys are very different to be sure, they each present their own challenges and rewards. In my experience one isn't any easier than other; sometimes my son is the easy one, sometimes my daughter. I think you get used to their differences when you live with them and what seems harder on the outside looking in isn't to those of us on the inside. Also, no living creatures other than people & cats are allowed in the house - EVER!

Posted by: CursingMama at June 24, 2005 02:28 PM

Hmm each has the plus and minus points, only got 1 nephew and he's a delight but he does have his moments.. hmm how I survived this long is anyone's guess as I was a real PITA when I was younger.

Posted by: Gopher at June 24, 2005 06:11 PM

Girls anytime. I raised three boys and one daughter, give me the split tail anyday .Cat

Posted by: catfish at June 24, 2005 09:31 PM

Little man has been the most wonderful, easy, snuggly, affectionate mothers child since the day he was born! Hormones have not yet come into the picture so you might need to check in again with me in a few years. Then there's princess who is sweet most of the time, but cry's mercilessly and pouts if something doesn't suit her....
and way on the other end of the boy spectrum is Hurricane Hut, who is ...well...a hurricane.
Girls....boys...I just don't know which is easier. They both fill your life with joy and frustration.

Posted by: Suzanne at June 24, 2005 11:41 PM

Boy Dogs.....

Posted by: Yabu at June 25, 2005 12:55 AM

I have three boys and no girls, so I can't say I'm directly experienced with the whole topic. That said, it has always *seemed* to me that boys, in general, tend to be harder as little ones - raging thugs until you teach 'em some manners - while girls are easier to deal with at that age. Around puberty, the girls go nuts and the boys are pretty rock-solid...for another few years, anyway.

The teen years? They all turn into a-holes and fruit-loops, until they're about, oh, twenty-four... ;)

Posted by: Kelley at June 26, 2005 10:32 PM

boys are cheaper and easier to please. girls are catty. I have 2 girls and 1 boy, my vote is boys

Posted by: livey at June 27, 2005 12:27 AM

Moogie,
Suzanne always sends me to your blog and we both laugh histericaly each time. great post as usual. I have finaly started my own blog, http://www.chasecrum.blogspot.com there's not much there now, but check it out sometime if you'd like.
-Chase

Posted by: chase at June 27, 2005 11:35 AM

I found you on augsburg and thought I would visit. Great site...love the design! And what a great post. I'm sure you'll have plenty of votes for both sides. I do not have children yet, but so far, with other people's children, I'm better with girls (maybe because I get them, as you described), but I also get most riled by girls and their ways. So I'm stuck in between!

Posted by: Mona at June 27, 2005 02:39 PM

I have 2 girls and 1 boy. I have to say my boy has been easier at this stage, but I don't think you can generalise too much. So many variables are involved...

Posted by: Ruth at June 27, 2005 09:25 PM

I have one of each.
Hula Girl is a breeze. At almost three I could have sold her to the circus but since then she's been easy.
Hula Boy on the other hand is very loud and energetic. He's all of the board. Granted he's almost three now but still...he's a wild child.
I would have to say girls when they are younger and boyswhen they're older!

Posted by: Hula Doula at June 28, 2005 11:21 AM

I have two girls and one boy, and I expect to have a new stepdaughter soon. No comparison. Yes, my son is a vulgar little man, but the constant drama festival revolving around the females is almost enough to put me over the edge on any given day. Besides, girls are just weird, and the difference is obvious from the moment they come out. They all eat like sparrows. They're horny by the time they're five. They don't like themselves, they don't like each other, and most of all, they don't like you. I love 'em, of course. But, they are far more stress than the boy, at least until he gets a girl in his life.

Posted by: Mike at June 30, 2005 12:31 PM